President-elect Uhuru Kenyatta |
The election
was also the first under the new constitution which was adopted in the 2010
referendum. The passage of the new
constitution in August 2010 introduced sweeping changes to the political
system. It was designed to, among other things, stave off another violent
outburst in the March 2013 elections. For instance, the new constitution
made the Kenyan electoral commission more independent with the establishment of
the Independent Electoral and
Boundaries Commission (IEBC). The Judiciary arm of government
also saw significant reforms.
The
2013 Kenyan elections was particularly expected to bring the much-needed unity
of purpose in the executive arm of the country's fractious coalition government
where power was shared between the two candidates of the two major parties
which locked horns in the 2007 presidential elections - Mwai Kibaki of the People’s
National Unity (PNU) was the president whilst his major political opponent in
the last elections, Raila Odinga, served as the prime minister in a deal to
achieve peace.
Eight
parties contested in this year's elections. However, the real contest was
between the two major coalition parties namely, The Jubilee Party led by Uhuru
Kenyatta, son of the founder and first president of Kenya, Jomo Kenyatta, and
The coalition of Reform and Democracy (CORD) led by Raila Odinga . This comes
as no surprise at all since Kenya has always been a two party state where
despite the prevalence of multiplicity of political parties, only two major
parties are capable of winning an election.
The
atmosphere in Kenya was characterized by a perfect mixture of excitement and
tension from a couple of weeks to the elections day up to the counting and
declaration of the results. The sudden excitement was necessitated by the privilege
of exercising their constitutional rights of choosing their leaders once again
since the country adopted their new constitution which won them the praise and
the admiration of the international community. On the other hand, the tension
was caused by the looming threat of a possible return to the horrendous scenes
of the 2007 elections based on the pockets of rioting and conflicts in key
areas and the intensity of unguarded and intemperate snide remarks made by none
other than key political actors.
After a close fought contest, Uhuru Kenyatta, who
was also one of the deputy prime ministers in the coalition government obtained
50.07% to clinch a first round victory. His major contender, Raila Odinga, came
second with 43.31%. According to the electoral commission, voter turnout was
88%.
The
elections once again posed a major test to the sustainability and the
resilience of Kenya’s Democracy. Nonetheless, the almost serene atmosphere in
which the elections was conducted coupled with the high level of participation,
the display of sheer fervor and civility in exercising the constitutional
rights of voting, and the fact that few serious life-threatening incidents were
recorded attest to the successful nature of the elections. It also lends
credence to the willingness of Kenyans to secure a stable and more lasting
democracy despite pockets of violence and rioting in some key areas of the
country.
Alas,
the success of this year’s elections has unburdened Kenyans of the guilt from
the bloody violence that characterized the infamous 2007 elections and has
started erasing the bad memories of 2007. It is quite obvious that many lessons
were gleaned from their last abysmal performance at the polls and have been
utilized as valuable ingredients for a recipe of wholesome and successful
elections.
The
country which was once the beacon of hope due to its political stability and
enviable economic prosperity in a region plagued with dictatorship, poverty,
famine and civil wars but suffered a massive setback during the 2007 elections
is determined to reclaim its political and economic glory by working tirelessly
towards the path of democratic consolidation and the deepening of democratic
tenets using the just ended elections as a launch pad and a political
springboard for successful future elections.
Kenyans
can breathe a sigh of relief and pat themselves on the back after calmly but
fearfully going through waves of escalating tension aggravated by the infamous call
by the camp of the CORD party to halt the vote counting during tallying, citing
“rampant illegality” across the entire election process and particularly flaws
in the ballot count as the sole reasons for their threatening stance.
However,
the decision by the defeated Raila Odinga and his CORD party to take their
grievances to the courts which is now more independent is nothing but noble and
an unequivocal manifestation of the country's willingness and determination to
consolidate their democracy and make it work. This is a major plus for a
country whose self-inflicted wounds in an unfortunate ghastly bloodbath after
the 2007 elections are demonstrably far from healed.
Indeed, it is a feather in the cap for Kenyans in a region where unfavorable electoral outcomes are hard to accept due to the polarized nature of the political climate worsened by the insidious and most reprehensible yet prevalent tribal us versus them attitude.
Indeed, it is a feather in the cap for Kenyans in a region where unfavorable electoral outcomes are hard to accept due to the polarized nature of the political climate worsened by the insidious and most reprehensible yet prevalent tribal us versus them attitude.
The
well acclaimed and much-vaunted success of this Kenyan election is not only a
big feat for Kenya's democracy but for the entire African sub-region. For the
country to emerge out of the recent election-induced tribal-motivated political
turmoil to beat the odds to face and overcome yet another daunting, potentially
explosive and passion-inflaming general elections serves as a perfect example
for many other African countries struggling with the inevitable challenges of
democracy.
Apart from the new constitution that created highly
autonomous political structures essential for free and fair elections and
important for democratic consolidation, the civil society organizations (CSOs),
the media, NGOs, and the introduction of election-monitoring technological
devices all contributed to the success of the Kenyan elections.
The excellent role played by the Kenyan media and
the CSOs in ensuring smooth and transparent elections cannot be gainsaid.
Effective civic education through both the print, broadcast, and the new
internet social media went a long way to not only build a groundswell of
enthusiasm among the populace, but importantly enlightened the voting public on
the 'Dos' and 'Don'ts' of voting, as well as the dangers and penalties of
electoral malpractices.
This no doubt contributed to the successful
elections in no small way as people were repeatedly sensitized on the
importance of political tolerance, the stoking effects of vitriolic speeches,
and supremely the need to safeguard, protect and maintain the priceless
national peace and unity they have striven hard to achieve to prevent another
unnecessary mayhem.
The
2013 Kenyan general elections have ended peacefully unlike the last 2007-08
elections. The hubbub that accompanied its beginning through to its end has
gradually faded away. Obviously, Kenya has learned vital lessons from this
quadrennial but extremely important bellwether of the strength and resilience
of any democracy. The vital political institutions have been tested and
stretched to their limits without crumbling in the midst of a turbulent
whirlwind of pressure from every angle. It is therefore no wonder that the
successful nature of this election has ignited a flickering flame of hope in
the hearts of Kenyans and lighted up their eyes with firmly grounded optimism
about their democratic future.
It
seems Kenyans can now confidently say a warm and permanent farewell to the
depressing, distressing and dehumanizing era of electoral violence. It is now
time to forge ahead into the future with optimism, hope and patriotism to
accelerate the development of their beloved country in absolute democratic
freedom.