-->

Thursday, 10 January 2013

"GOD IS DEAD" Part 1


Friedrich Nietzsche

“God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him…” - Friedrich Nietzsche

 “If God really existed, it would be necessary to abolish him.”- Mikhail Bakunin

Various religions, religious denominations and even individuals have formed different conceptions about this God. In line with their conception, they worship him the way they feel it pleases Him. 

While some are motivated by sheer love in their service of the "universal consciousness" otherwise referred to as God, others too do it unwillingly and grimly for fear of his divine wrath and grievous punishment. Other people too follow him religiously not because they yearn to willingly obey his sometimes-strict requirements but particularly for what they believe they can get -financially and materially- from following this God. Well, you might call it very selfish.

On the contrary, many a people are inclined to side with Friedrich Nietzsche that God is “dead”. Though Nietzsche had his own reasons for making such a courageous and outrageous statement, others prefer to interpret his words to suit their own observations. For  instance, 19th century philosopher Mikhail Bakunin and others who share his line of reasoning posit that the “death” or inexistence of God is good for total human liberty and therefore believed that if  God really existed, it would be necessary and in the interest of all to abolish him.

God is dead? For people who believe in the demise of God or in his nonexistence, they don't find it surprising when people's prayers go unanswered. When people are sick and bedridden and there is no healing from above despite the patient's seemingly godly ways, the best explanation they could conjure or conjecture is either God simply doesn't care about human affairs or is simply suffocated to death by depraved, corrupt, violent and sickening human conduct and activities.

Even when there are violent wars where man is bitterly slaughtered by fellow man, when there are earthquakes that swallow hundreds and thousands of souls and destroys families, when there are poverty that impoverishes and fatally reduces the quality of life of many a people, when there are injustices, crimes of all sorts, pain and suffering, people are just disappointed when they understandably raise up their heads and ask God sincerely and justifiably the oft-repeated question   “Oh God, why?" only to be responded with a deafening silence from the "causeless cause"  and the “ birthless” and supposed “deathless” deity above.

For frustrated mankind, the only conclusion they can draw is that God is dead. If God isn't dead, why doesn't he use his infinite powers to solve the world's bizarre problems? why does he allow so-called men of God to misrepresent him and shamelessly use his name and his word to intimidate and dupe people, engage in loose and promiscuous conduct, constantly lie to their members through fake dreams and visions, perform fake healing and miracles to deceive even the elect and the elite and deliberately twist, misinterpret and misapply God's word to deceive thousands into blind submission to their authority? If God is alive, why doesn't he strike them with a bolt of lightening to put a stop to the defamation of his name and character? Why does God watch apathetically to the corrupt conduct of politicians who claim God's backing for their nomination, appointment or election but take delight in self-aggrandizement and greedy accumulation of national wealth at the expense of the masses?

The last straw that seems to break the camel’s back is when God if he was alive sat unconcerned for decades of intense religious persecutions and atrocities done in his holy name that took away countless of innocent and righteous lives. Indeed, it seems the worst injustices have been perpetrated in the name of religion and God.

Mikhail Bakunin
Currently, Good has been labeled as bad and bad good. People who pursue righteousness and godliness suffer whilst those who immerse themselves in every wrong conduct and behavior prosper at the speed of light. Shouldn’t the reverse be the case?  If God is that powerful and alive, why doesn’t he step in to correct matters and clear his name of all the reproach heaped on him? No wonder many people are concluding God is no more - dead.

 This is what Nietzsche obviously meant when he implied God is dead. Mere Humans have ably and completely reversed the just values and reward system purportedly instituted in our conscience by the omniscient and omnipotent God, and this is even worsened by the “ungolden” silence of the Almighty. One couldn’t agree more with Nietzsche when he stated “God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him….”

This increasingly attests to the fact that the existence of God might be a sham after all probably contrived artfully and intelligently by a bunch of old but clever religious men who saw his existence necessary.

But is God really “dead”?   


2 comments:

  1. Very well written. Captures the concern of many a philosopher and thinking person that has ever existed. Although this so called "problem of evil" is still one of the most difficult quandaries theology and apologetics alike has wrestled with and still wrestles with, the fact that it is so problematic does not necessarily mean "God" as such, does not exist. Perhaps, this would apply to the version of "God" whose attributes directly conflict with the inherent nature of the "problem of evil" but then this is only one such "version". Many others are possible and amongst these, one of them may be the God that really exists.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks very much Vincent. True, the "problem of evil" is one that has baffled not only religious leaders, but as you rightly noted, philosophers and thinking people in general. I tried to answer the "problem of evil" in part 2 of the article from God's (the Bible) viewpoint. Nevertheless, reconciling the awesome nature of God with the awful problems of the world has never been easy to thinking minds. But the existence of God is highly probable and I tried to address that in part 2 of the article in question,

    ReplyDelete

CSS -->